The Super Prime Minister, Sonia Gandhi, the Congress Goddess.

Posted by Dr. Gopal Unnikrishna Kurup

The Super Prime Minister, Sonia Gandhi, the Congress      Goddess.

The then Union Minister for Tribal Affairs, Kantilal Bhuria, in February 2010, received a letter from Congress party president and UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi, offering some suggestions on the Forest Rights act then under formation and asking for his response. Bhuria did not respond with alacrity to this extra-governmental source of instructions and when he was bombarded with reminders, he finally in June responded negatively, not accepting the suggestions. The knave Minister who foolishly deluded himself that as minister he had the authority to take decisions in matters concerned with his portfolio, even in recommendations by the Madam, was soon to pay dearly for his gall to reject the 'recommendations'. In the Cabinet reshuffle the next month, Bhuria was unceremoniously sacked. In his place was appointed V Kishore Chandra Deo, who knowing what was required of him, promptly took on board the “suggestions” from on top, which eventually made it into law.

These happenings have been revealed from documents obtained under R.T.I. ( by Economic Times) which go to show to what extent Sonia Gandhi is involved in minutiae of policy matters and with what exertions she imposes her will in pushing them through the government and also punishing whoever offends her in the way. It also exposes to what mockery the prime Minister is reduced to and who really rules the roost. The R.T.I. documents also showed that in that year, Prime Minister got bombarded with 25 N.A.C.letters and individual Ministers with not less than 17 letters, all urging the recipients to toe her line. Although the letters are purported to be from NAC and signed by her as its chairperson everyone knows that they in fact embody Sonia's commandments couched in more civil form as "recommendations'.


All the revenue guzzling grandiose social security schemes are Sonia's flagship schemes designed to be populist even at the cost of national exchequer, and by riding on them to secure votes in elections. Whenever the next election is looming  in the horizon, there is bound to be a flurry of such populist bills, and schemes, - only this time, the game had started much earlier. Food Security Bill is one such, toppling the budget and widening the fiscal deficit at a time when the nation can ill afford it.

National Advisory Council is nothing but Sonia Gandhi's backyard kitchen where such fast food items are cooked up.  From the leafy bungalow, 2 Motil Lal Marg nestled inside the Lutyen's zone, the Council quietly operates under her matron-ship giving her an aura of tenability, and most conveniently, without accountability. Such arrangement affords her the escape facility to remain anonymous if things go awry  and send her son and heir to throne, Rahul Gandhi to land on the scene with Jupiter's velocity and bomb out her own government, which had merely done what she had said, but now the wrong-doer before the people ( but mind you, not she).

Of course,it was from its pantry during UPA 1 that NREGA, RTI, Prevention of Domestic Violence and Forest Rights Bills were conceived. It did set the social political agenda of the UPA. It gave the UPA 1 a pro-poor image and edge, which ultimately won them the 2009 Lok Sabha elections. But then, NAC of UPA 1 was  very different from NAC of UPA 2. There was a Common Minimum Programme and lot of committed people were in the body and the allies had a say. Allies monitored the suggestions. But now, none of the sort. ,NAC has turned in to solely an extra-constitutional body impacting the sovereignty of the decision-making process of the Union Cabinet. The PM has voice which he seldom uses, but no power -perhaps the reason why he seldom says anything.

The power behind the throne, the Super Prime Minister, Sonia Gandhi, the resident behind the high walls of 10, Janpath is the ultimate authority who must be obeyed, but who hovers beyond all notions of accountability.

The Theater Of The Absurd

Posted by Dr. Gopal Unnikrishna Kurup

 The Theater of the Absurd

 

 

 With a dogged resolve of a crass politician, Sonia Gandhi presides over the political decision making  core group of Congress party, and much against the wind of public sentiments and also much against the sane opinion of a minority inside the group (that included  Veerappa Moily), and aided and abetted by hustlers like Kapli Sibal, triumphantly decides to defy the Supreme Court, and to bring in an ordinance on the bill  to save the convicted MPs marauding in her party and in  UPA as law makers.  On July 10, the Supreme Court had ruled that an MP or MLA would be immediately disqualified if convicted by a court in a criminal offense with a jail sentence of two years or more The immediate imperative was that Lalu Prasad, her staunch ally might meet his nemesis and  be consigned to the cattle manger of a hefty term of imprisonment that could call curtains for his political life. Greatly concerned, her core group decides to rescue Lalu the ally by proclaiming hurriedly an ordinance on the bill and thus outwit the court verdict. Prime Minister and his cabinet carried out the core group's directive to the letter, and gave shape to The Representation of the People (Amendment and Validation) Ordinance, 2013 allowing convicted MPs and MLAs to continue in office if their appeal is admitted by a higher court within 90 days and the conviction stayed, which was then dispatched to the President for signing.

The  BJP who initially had gone along with the bill, now sensed the strong ground swell of public sentiments that had already turned into a whooping gale against any such move to protect criminal politicians, simply backtracked and  tried to stall the bill by causing it to be sent to a standing committee. They then proceeded to oppose  the totally untenable ordinance tooth and nail, and even met the President urging him not to sign it. Then came the blow which the dynasty never reckoned with. The President,-their erstwhile man of all seasons - however  gave clear indication that he is not happy with either the ordinance, or the proposed bill.

For the first time since Indira Gandhi's confrontation with the "syndicate", the dynasty's might was shaken and the Congress party  embroiled in another devastating doldrums, this time almost fatal. The dynasty decided to jump out of the sinking boat on to terra firma and leave the captain and the crew to its fate. The jump was as sudden and dramatic as the criticality of the situation demanded. The prince hates being caught wet and soiled. So he shook himself dry and declared to the effect that having watched the whole episode through a pair of binoculars from a long distance in Delhi," my opinion is that the ordinance is nonsense and it should be torn up and thrown away" ..[ ie. before the President  does so ].

Fair-minded people may ask even if the dynasty found that the ordinance which they chaperoned is backfiring, it could have quietly pulled the strings on the govt. to withdraw it. They should realize  that the dynasty saw the resultant fiasco back lashing on them more than the govt and the PM, who are already discredited anyway.  They were scared to their wit's end that people will see that the dynasty is prone to blunder. How that it could be; the dynasty can never be wrong - or else everything is lost. Drastic situations require drastic remedies The Prince took leave from his extracurricular activities and decided to shoot from the hip. He did and came out like a Rambo and a hero, the gun smoking profusely and leaving every one flummoxed, some to the point of consternation. The prince thus proved that he is much above all that muck even after wallowing in it all along.. Let the world behold and be thrilled.

The prince is now prim and prime,spick and span; it is the PM and his team wet and sick. It seems there is great future for jumping jacks in the Congress theater of the absurd

 The man who makes merry on the sly here is Nitish Kumar of JD(U). Whether or not  he tantalizingly held at a 'jumpable' height a half ripe banana of his chance, or even offer, of joining the UPA, which contributed to the spirited acrobatics of the young scion, might remain a part of the mysterious palace intrigues. One should see the obvious fall out of enormous potential of a  Lalu-devoid battle ground to fight the resurgent BJP in Bihar. In this Wild Life week the thought arises that one of the abundant species in the Indian jungle is the jackal.

Twinkle Like A Star

Posted by Dr. Gopal Unnikrishna Kurup

Twinkle Like A Star

In the darkening twilight
When shadows lengthen,.
And the hues become lighter
The sky shines ethereal,
You twinkle like a star.

Then the sea sways less
Sending shimmering waves
Leans on the land in embrace
And finds its peace with heavens.

Lo!, a light breeze wings from afar
Like a white bird darting from a star
To flutter your sleeves of lace,
And strands of hair to your face
Mentioning its message to your eyes
Making them twinkle like stars.

When it grows darker and darker
And all the cows come home
The sad courtyard lies lonesome
Staring at the cloudy sky for cover
Beckoning me to come step over
And watch you twinkle like a star.

Akhilesh Yadav: The Man in a Muddle, with Muzaffarnagar Riots

Posted by Dr. Gopal Unnikrishna Kurup

Akhilesh Yadav: The man in a muddle, with Muzaffarnagar Communal Riots

At no point did Akhilesh seem to think that the situation would get out of hand in a manner that the Army would have to be called in for the first time in over a decade to control a communal flare-up in Uttar Pradesh. It was a severe indictment of his administration, for this was not a riot that came like a bolt from the blue. It had been festering for a while, and Akhilesh as well as his officers were well aware of this.

    His Director General of Police had just returned from the area a day before and told him matters were under control. Prior to that, a Senior Additional Director General of Police had been sent from Lucknow and deployed there specifically to handle the situation. Akhilesh was confident that the worst was over in Muzaffarnagar—an assessment that would prove to be terribly wrong as the day wore on. Rajendra Chaudhary, the lone Jat minister in Akhilesh's cabinet, kept wondering if the situation had really worsened. Because this area of riots were considered a stronghold of Rashtriya Lok Dal (RLD) leader Ajit Singh.

Uttar Pradesh has a population of nearly 200 million with socioeconomic indicators worse than many parts of sub-Saharan Africa.The state has a long history of sectarian violence. Sushilkumar Shinde, the India's home minister, said that 451 incidents had been reported to date this year in Uttar Pradesh, compared with 410 throughout 2012. Many are now nervous that rival political groups will seek to exploit communal tensions to build support in advance of general elections scheduled for next spring.   .

However, it is said that the communities in Muzaffarnagar involved in the weekend violence did not have a history of tension. The immediate cause of the weekend's violence appears to be the killings in Kawai village of three Jat men following an incident involving the sexual harassment of a Hindu teenage girl. According to one account, the brothers of the girl killed her persecutor but were then killed themselves by members of his sister's tormentors belonging to Muslim community.  Sexual harassment of women is widespread in rural villages in Uttar Pradesh and often leads to feuds and violence.  Politicians had extinguished any chance of a return to normal. Just three days after,, on Friday, after Friday prayers, a meeting was called by religious leaders and politicians in Muzaffarnagar, around 125 kilometres north east of Delhi. with an audience of about 2,000 people, most of them Muslims, local leaders from the Congress and Mayawati's Bahujan Samaj Party or BSP ttaking the stage. Rioting began in earnest on Saturday night after a meeting of thousands of  farmers called .or justice following the deaths. Officials said some leaders of all the political parties had given hate speeches.

When asked why they didn't intervene to have the meeting cancelled, local officials claimed they had been misled. Kaushal Raj, the District Magistrate of Muzaffarnagar, said that religious leaders had said the meeting would focus on collecting a petition demanding justice in the Kawal case, but that the gathering was then hijacked by the politicians - Qader Rana and Jameel Ahmed of the BSP, and Saeed-uz-zaman of the Congress. On Saturday evening, at a mahapanchayat, BJP leaders from the area addressed thousands of farmers with allegedly incendiary speeches, charges they have denied. On their way home, farmers were attacked and killed. Since then, 36 people have died.

Uttar Pradesh is seen as a bellwether state, sending 80 representatives to the lower house of parliament, almost a seventh of the total.The SP won state elections in 2012 and will hope to garner sufficient national seats in Uttar Pradesh in the coming general elections to negotiate from a position of strength when a coalition government is formed.Samajwadi party (SP), in power in the state since 2012, may be hoping communal tensions will consolidate its own support, particularly among Uttar Pradesh's large Muslim population

India's Infatuation for Gold

Posted by Dr. Gopal Unnikrishna Kurup

India's Infatuation for gold

   

They say in Western culture that a diamond is a girl’s best friend. So, if a diamond is a girl’s best friend in America, gold is even more than that in India. India's infatuation with gold is phenomenal. It is deeply ingrained in our socio-cultural practices with wedding seasons seeing the maximum purchase of the metal. In fact, India’s love for gold is ancient as the Indus Valley civilization, (circa 2500 BC), when people wore gold jewelry. The Gupta dynasty (250 AD) is known as the Golden Age, when gold coins were circulated widely. The gene is still strong and we cannot have  enough of gold. Therefor gold is country's biggest import after oil.  Cultural factors, such as festivals like Deepavali and Akshaya Tritiya, both considered auspicious occasions to buy gold.  Gold  is far more than just a nice thing to wear at Indian weddings. It's a  key element of the religion and culture in a country that consumes 20%  of global production of the metal. In India it is status symbol, sign of  respect, inflation hedge, repository of emergency savings and, of  course, something to make the bride shine. This has led to a spurt in purchase in the recent years which has caused a rocketing of India’s imports of the metal. The government seems to have woken up quite late to the fact that banks have been en-cashing on the average Indian’s infatuation with gold.

   

Indian households have piled up as much as 20,000 tonnes of gold, worth $1.16 trillion, an historic high. The World Gold Council’s (WGC) latest estimate of India’s household gold reserves is 11% higher than the 18,000 tonnes it had been pegged at earlier. Coupled with 557.7 tonnes of the central bank’s holdings, gold stocks at known sources in the world’s largest consumer would represent more than 75% of its gross domestic product. According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), the country is the largest gold importer in the world with about US$56 billion worth of the yellow metal coming across borders during the 2011-2012 fiscal year. On top of that there are about 400 tonnes of scrap gold entering the Indian market every year, worth another $17bn or so at today's prices.

   

But why is gold being made such a villain as it is made now all of a sudden ? Twenty two years ago, when our economy was tottering, it was this yellow metal which rescued it from a probable collapse. India had to airlift 47 tons of gold to the Bank of England and 20 tons of gold to the Union Bank of Switzerland in 1991 to raise $600 million to tide over payment obligations. Not only that, the yellow metal has rescued several households during crisis. In the last few decades, gold has been used as collateral for loans especially for the home loans. Such schemes were also promoted by private and public sector banks aggressively. If the government was so wise, why didn’t it stop banks from doing so when they started?

In fact, it is the same UPA government (which is now advising Indians not to buy gold) that went ahead and bought gold from the international monetary fund (IMF). In 2009, when the IMF started limited gold sales programme, it was the RBI which bought 200 tonnes of gold valued at Rs 31,490 crore ($6.7 billion). At the time, many analysts hailed it a ‘course correction’ of the 1991 decision of the government. The RBI’s move was not bizarre because dollar was weakening and the apex bank built its reserve on gold to shift away from holding assets in dollars.

   

The crux of the matter is that the gold should be used for what it is good at, that is, a hedge against inflation. Timothy Green, a well-known gold expert, reminds us of a historical truth: “The great strength of gold throughout history has not been that you make money by holding it, but rather you do not lose. That ought to remain its best credential”.

   

It is the the import of such huge quantities of gold needed to satiate India's huge appetite for it, and the inability of the Indian government to properly regulate those imports, has contributed to the record current account deficit that has in turn led to a generational depreciation of the rupee. The nation's swooning economy, marked by a sharp drop in its currency in recent weeks, has pushed gold prices sharply higher, pain that's been compounded by a government decision to increase import duties on precious metals to 10% from 4%. The government now sees in the yellow metal a detriment to the nation’s economy.The government's decision to increase the tax on gold just before the November-February wedding season indicates how worried Indian economic planners have become as fiscal deficits have soared, the trade deficit has hit 4.6% and stocks have headed for the basement, knocking nearly $100 billion off the market's value in August.

Adding to the bad-news drumbeat, foreign reserves have fallen to $280 billion, or the equivalent of seven months worth of imports, and economic growth has plunged to 4.4%, less than half its 2010-11 level Meanwhile, the rupee's 16% decline against the dollar this year has made it among Asia's worst-performing currencies, forcing Indians to pay more for gasoline, imported medicines, foreign trips and education. "India has become the sick man of Asia," said Rajiv Biswas, Asia-Pacific chief economist with IHS, a market information firm. "Global investors have gradually realized in 2012 and 2013 that the Indian government is 'wearing no clothes' in the area of economic policy reforms."

   

The steps India needs to take are evident, but they are politically difficult. They include cutting subsidies and other populist welfare policies that drive up government deficits; reducing red tape, opaque regulations and inconsistent tax policies that deter investors; intervening in currency markets earlier; and addressing a string of corruption scandals in the defense, real estate, telecommunications, mining and sports sectors. Bureaucrats and politicians are in paralysis and don't want to make decisions because all around them is some sort of scam.

   

Obama's Baby Missile Attack On Syria

Posted by Dr. Gopal Unnikrishna Kurup

U.S.A.'s Threat of Missile Attack on Syria

Russia on Tuesday announced that its early warning system had detected the launch of two ballistic missiles from the central part of the Mediterranean Sea fired towards the Sea's eastern coastline. According to the Russian media the missiles detected have fallen into Mediterranean sea. That was the only cue needed for the Indian nervous stock market to react depressingly.The Sensex slumped 700 points, Nifty fell over 200 points and the BSE banking index fell up to 5.3%, - all after the Russian defense ministry's announcement.

While world leaders grapple with what to do about Syria, the reports of carnage on the ground keep rising. At least 118 people were killed across Syria on Sunday, including 13 children, the opposition group Local Coordination Committees of Syria said. And 63 people were killed across the country on Monday, including eight children, according to the opposition Local Coordination Committees of Syria. State-run news agency SANA said the army killed "scores of terrorists" Monday and destroyed their hideouts.The United Nations has said more than 100,000 people - including many civilians - have been killed since a popular uprising spiraled into a civil war two years ago.

Public opinion may be a poor guide to the low-down of state policy. But that opinion carries the burden of two long wars, both failures. As a result, leaders have been sufficiently cautious to pass decision to their national assemblies. In British the result was a rebuff. In Washington, President Obama has decided to refer Syria to Congress and France's president, François Hollande, may do likewise.

Obama said Saturday, "We are looking at the possibility of a limited, narrow act.  But the administration will have to overcome "a lot of distrust among the American people" as well as of the world about the intelligence that accusing Syria's government of a poison gas attack outside Damascus in late August.

Russia rejects Kerry's claim that the United States has all the evidence it needs. China weighed in Monday as well. The United Nations, meanwhile, said evidence that could show whether chemical weapons were used in Syria was being delivered to a lab on Monday. But a U.N. spokesman would not estimate how long it may take to get results. Even when results are released, they won't show who was responsible

Britain, which was just as forceful a voice for military action as the United States, also won't take part after the House of Commons rejected a resolution that would have opened the door for British attacks against Syria. In Yemen, meanwhile, that country's parliament on Monday announced its opposition to any outside intervention in Syria. France, although a supporter, has said it won't act without the United States as a partner. And NATO itself won't take military action against Syria. So the world is looking at the United States, as to what it will do.

It is this stiff disapproval within and out that made President Obama decide to seek Congressional support. The Administration is trying hard to garner support for their “limited action”. Obviously, the main reason is that the they want to signal increased support for Syria's opposition in a bid to shift the balance of power in Syria's two and a half year-old civil war. Administration officials will be conducting classified briefings on Syria for Congress nearly every day this week. Obama will meet with House Speaker John Boehner and Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, congressional aides said, and he'd already planned talks with the leaders of the key national security committees in the House and Senate.

Republicans hold the House, 233-200, with two vacancies. Obama's gamble to seek congressional backing carries many risks, chief among them is that Congress might thwart him and make him look weak around the world. Lawmakers are split, worried about whether military strikes could worsen the situation - partly because the opposition in Syria includes al Qaeda-linked extremists such as the al-Nusra Front. As a respite, following Obama's last-minute decision to hold off until Congress weighs in, no such action is expected until after lawmakers reconvene from recess on September 9

 U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said Monday. Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and United Arab Emirates have offered the United States use of their military assets for action against Syria. However, two senior Arab diplomats said talks with Saudi Arabia and the UAE are preliminary, and no details have been discussed. Administration also lets it out that Blood and hair samples obtained from first responders through an "appropriate chain of custody" have "tested positive for signatures of sarin" gas. It's unclear exactly how the United States obtained the material independently of the United Nations.

The United Nations charter generally doesn't allow countries to attack other nations unless in self-defense or with approval from the U.N. Security Council. But United States, Britain, and France couldn't get support from the United Nations for a strike on Syria, because Syria's allies in the U.N. Security Council - Russia and China - are sure to block any U.N. effort. Russia, which has major trade deals with Syria, is sending a delegation to Washington for "dialogue" with members of Congress.

Under U.S. law, Obama doesn't have to get Congress' approval to launch military action. The 1973 War Powers Resolution authorizes a president to initiate an attack as long as he notifies Congress within 48 hours. But internationally, a U.S. strike against Syria could be deemed illegal.

The reason why a missile attack on Syria is proving so unpopular on both sides of the Atlantic has nothing to do with imperialist aversion. The reason is that it is a bad idea. "Punishing" a dictator for killing his own people by simply killing more of his own people seems beyond cruel. It seems stupid. It leads nowhere.

Syria has repeatedly denied being behind an August 21 chemical weapons attack that killed hundreds of people. Al-Assad's regime Monday asked U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon "to shoulder his responsibilities for preventing any aggression on Syria, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, meanwhile, warned that a regional war could break out if Syria is attacked."The Middle East is a powder keg, and the fire is approaching today”

In Syria, an attack would be in retaliation for a suspected breach of international law on chemical weapons.  Action is described as merely punitive and a "deterrent", directed purely at a past incident of a deemed chemical massacre. A gesture war like this will not punish the guilty, who should be arraigned before a war crimes court. ‘Limited action’ will merely destroy buildings and kill people. It seems peculiarly pointless

In the attacks on Serbia, Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya, the goal of western intervention was at least clear. It was to topple a regime. Since the UN forbids such overt aggression against member states, action must be dressed up as humanitarian or to enforce UN resolutions. But everyone knows what is the intended outcome.In Syria's civil war, there is no moral high ground. There is only the quicksand of a wider Middle East conflict that the U.S. must carefully navigate.

Some of the strongest factions aligned against Assad's regime have links to al-Qaeda, which is waging a worldwide terrorist campaign against U.S. If the forces trying to topple Assad prevail, Syria could become the world's first al-Qaeda-led nation -- an outcome would almost certainly draw large numbers of U.S. ground forces back onto a Middle East.

An American military attack against Assad will strengthen the hand of those who want to turn Syria into an Islamic state. And if that happens, neighboring Jordan will almost certainly fall to a jihadist movement. The tumbling of those dominion due to an ill-conceived U.S. intervention in Syria's civil war might also bring down Iraq's government  which is wedged between Iran, Syria and Jordan. That fledgling government might not survive if it is surrounded by militant Islamic states

That is why the world is skeptical. It is not the west's "might is right empire" that should be in retreat. If it is the brazen deployment of aerial bombardment as a cure-all for the world's ills also, then some good would have been done. 

Asaram Bapu Godman Should Find Vishram in Rajasthan Jail

Asaram Bapu Godman Should Find Vishram in Rajasthan Jail

Finally, after much drama, the self styled godman Asaram Bapu has been arrested by the Rajasthan Police and taken to Jodhpur.

Every political party has an underbelly of vote bank politics which they keep under wrap of some ostensible and openly presentable pretext. Parties like Samajwadi (S.P.) or Janata Dal (United) (J.D.(U.) do not even bother to cover up. The Congress Party clothes it in some fashionable socialist  or democratic designs. The Bharatiya Janata Party (B.J.P.) has no ready-made vote bank; what it has is an amorphous , mutating body of voters shaped by political dynamics the  times. So they have their belly shown bare under their saffron shawl. Then, Narendra Modi comes along and readily changes the shawl color in to a tricolor and make it a designer wear. People are fascinated and ready to make a vogue of it.

Leaders are there in every political party whose knees jerk and mouths blurt. The B.J.P. has one such in Uma Bharti, the samnyasin for all seasons. With all the yogic powers even Muni Durvasas could.not contain his uncontrollable anger, what then of poor rolled-gold samnyasini like U.Bharti when it comes to impetuosity! Like a quarrelsome bahu she had wandered in and out of B.J.P. house. There could be a huff and hue in the offing unless snapped or snubbed by the party High Priest Advaniji.. As robes come, Asaram Bapu's is not even saffron. His is pure white lie.. He apparently takes out the dagger he hides under that white cloak very selectively and not certainly in presence of fellow samnyasins.. Then how could have she, being also a politician, given a testimony for this 'Bapu'. For a party with an amorphous plastic vote bank such utterances could lead only to a melt down of their rank.

It seems crowd pullers have a numbing effect on the loose tongues of politicians. What else explains the reactions of muted tones, deafening silence, and cliches like "let law takes its own course" indulged in by the major and even minor parties? Even after Uma Bharti did a song and dance for the benefit of Asaram, the  B.J.P. bigwigs kept a studied silence, unfortunately leading the juveniles among the party to synchronize with that jarring tune till the genuine pulse-feeling Narendra Modi instilled some sense into all of them. Modi is the only leader in India now who is tuned to people's rhythm and beat. Others sway to pop and rock or to some cock and bull.


The very concept of a vote bank , especially in case of minority communities may have to be studied more. Gone are the days when religion dictated the political responses of the masses. Today the common man especially the middle class by and large are more bothered by means to keep up with Joneses in social status, and prioritize securing modern material comforts more than spiritual adherence at any cost. Religion does have a place certainly but there is a separate space for it. Even in our interior villages the living room or drawing room gets the best attention, and the prayer room is sequestrated untainted by drawing room overlap. More and more people are adopting a stand of god's due for god and devil's due for devil. Muslim observers particularly negate the existence of any Muslim vote bank. They say, Muslims vote like any other Indian voter and not en masse on religious cues. Much of topsy turvy political antics defying sense and propriety will disappear once this reality dawns on our political class.

Meanwhile, the godman turned fraudman Asaram was running amok like a fugitive without vishram. As is the wont of things happening to ordinary folks, Asaram should have been booked many days back. Let him now find ultimate vishram in jail.